Thursday, May 24, 2007

We Don't Torture, More Lies From Bush/Cheney

Here we go again, just when you thought it couldn't get any worse. Yesterday, The White House announced an Executive Order that would let the CIA resume what they refer to rapturously as “severe interrogation methods for questioning terrorism suspects in secret prisons overseas”.

Oh yeah, never mind that the Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that American prisoners should be treated according to Geneva Convention standards prohibiting torture. Heck I'm the decider. I'll just issue this executive order, take Scalia out for a drink and then off to get the colon washed out while Dick plans his Iran war.

We do not torture? Anyone believe anything shrubya says anymore?  This president is not to be believed about anything, under any circumstances and especially when it comes to denials that we torture.

It’s been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that during the last five years, the US has been torturing on a massive scale. Renditions, secret detention centers, routine torture of detainees, Bush and Cheney have just unilaterally and illegally stopped complying with the Geneva conventions on the treatment of prisoners of war and the United Nations convention against torture. The Bush policy can be summed up quite easily, America must not allow itself to be weakened by respect for human rights.

Torture was common practice at the military base in Bagram, Afghanistan, Abu Graib and Guantanamo as well as at many other secret gulags around the world. According to eyewitness accounts, prisoners were routinely beaten, sexually abused, humiliated,  kicked in the groin, slammed into walls, and had water forced into their mouths until they could not breathe. Many died.

Aside from being legally indefensible, abhorent and revolting, our torture of detainees has completely eviscerated what little moral standing we had left in the world.

Until the smirking chimp and Dr. Evil are gone and we regain our sanity and start acting like the moral country that we used to be, we will continue to be targeted and flounder dangerously in an increasingly perilous world.


Monday, May 21, 2007

Stop Junk Mail, Save Our Resources

Did you know more than 100 million trees are destroyed each year to produce junk mail? About 28 billion gallons of water are also wasted, and the energy used to produce and dispose of junk mail exceeds 2.8 million cars. One good one is 41 Pounds. For $41, they will do all the leg-work to reduce your junk mail by 80-95% for five years, and will donate $15 to StopGlobalWarming.org. There are many others you can find online. When you sign up,they will contact direct marketing organizations to remove your name from their lists. This includes credit card applications, coupon mailers, sweepstakes entries, magazine offers and insurance promotions, as well as any catalogs you specify. Save time! Save trees! Save the planet!Add to Technorati Favorites

The Truth About Reagan, Race And The GOP

The GOP’s difficulties attracting minority voters to their camp today is in large part rooted in the anti-minority policies espoused by Ronald Reagan.

Oscar Eason, Jr., former president of the Seattle branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People says,

During Reagan's administration, the issues and concerns of the Dixiecrats became principally those of the Republican Party. It was precisely at this juncture that the Republican Party ceased being the Party of Lincoln and evolved into what it is today to the vast majority of black America, almost racially exclusive and dedicated to protecting and maintaining the status quo.
Yet, it’s commonplace for the GOP presidential candidates to be in a perpetual state of reverential delirium, knocking each other over while frenetically stampeding to prostrate themselves drooling at the alter of Ronald Reagan. Each one claims to be the sole and rightful heir to the hallowed throne of the Gipper, the keeper of the conservative holy grail.

As each day goes by, the political canonization of Ronald Reagan becomes more indelibly etched into American political folklore. It has taken on an ethereal life of it’s own and has become one of the most reprehensible mischaracterizations and public relations scams in history. What’s particularly disturbing is not that the reactionary right embraces him as the second coming, to be expected, but that some Democrats and the media have also been sucked into buying the hallucinatory propaganda about Reagan as well. Oh, how nostalgic we are, he was just a harmless nice man who made everyone in the country feel good. Well, not everyone.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

The Lies That Led Us To War – For Them, Let Us Never Forget

"Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it" -- George Santayana

Almost five years into the invasion and occupation of Iraq, we are now focused rightfully on extricating ourselves from the quagmire there, saving more lives from being lost and trying to repair the harm done our reputation and moral standing in the world. But, as the Presidential election of 2008 approaches, let us keep fresh in our minds and never forget the lies of the Republican administration in power that took us down this disastrous path. We have to remember in order to make sure that it never happens again. Those on the GOP side who still support this misadventure in Iraq need to be held accountable; we owe it to the young men and women coming home in flag draped coffins.

Let's take a look at the facts . . .

According to the great majority of the American people, there is no longer any doubt that the Bush Administration's pre-war claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction were manipulated to mislead the country. The evidence shows that the decision to go to war was the culmination of a long-term plan to attack Iraq. This plan included falsifying evidence, ignoring intelligence conclusions not condusive to their position, manipulating intelligence reports and knowingly disseminating false information to the United Nations, Congress and the American people.

The Downing Street memo, minutes of a Tony Blair meeting with senior advisers in July 2002, nearly eight months before the war began has proved that the White House, as the head of British intelligence put it, was determined to fix "the intelligence and facts" around it’s predetermined policy of going to war in Iraq. We now know the president knew that the intelligence he cherry-picked was wrong, but used it anyway to sell us the war.

There were no WMD's in Iraq nor was their a connection between the 9-11 highjackers, Al Qaeda and Iraq. George W. Bush and his administration, namely Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell and Rice made their case for war with Iraq to the American people and the world in a series of strongly worded accusations. They said with no ambiguity that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and were a clear and present danger to the United States.

To be fair, at first it was hard to ascertain with reasonable certitude whether such accusations were the truth, lies, biases, or whether Bush and his administration were simply not competent. That’s why many well meaning Democrats extended their faith in what this administration told them; it was unimaginable that the any administration would intentionally deceive Congress. Authorizing the right to take military action is one thing, taking it when there were other options for peace still available is another. Now we know that there were a series of deliberate deceptions. The Congress, the people of the United States and the world were deceived and we went to war under false pretenses, resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands of American soldiers and Iraqi citizens and emboldening terrorists like never before. Let there be no doubt, this is George Bush's and the GOP's war.

After the indictment of Scooter Libby and the outing of Valerie Plame, the world got a peek at just what this administration would do to attack and destroy people speaking the truth about Iraq who they considered their enemy. The case for war was made based on a number of speeches Bush made including his State-Of-The-Union address and Collin Powell's ill-advised presentation to the United Nations. Let’s look at the facts again and not at the hyperbole as the Bush administration’s justification for war is stripped naked for all to see.

Here are the specifics:

BUSH LIE: The administration said that Iraq had chemical weapons and that satellite photos of buildings, bunkers, and trucks showed secretive movement to hide missiles and chemical/biological weapons. The US said that trucks at two sites were decontamination vehicles for use with chemical weapons.

THE TRUTH: The facts say otherwise. These sites had been inspected about 500 times by U.N. inspectors and Hans Blix reported that his inspectors found no evidence that contraband had been evacuated. Norwegian U.N. inspector Jorn Siljeholm also told AP that he had followed up on similar intelligence and found that the vehicles were ordinary fire trucks and water trucks, that's all. Since that time of course, there have been no reports of anything being found.

BUSH LIE: This administration also said that Iraq had VX a nerve agent where a single drop on the skin is fatal within minutes.

THE TRUTH: In fact, most of the 4 tons of VX Iraq was supposed to have was destroyed in the 1990's under U.N. supervision. Iraq tried to prove before the war began that the rest had been destroyed by chemically analyzing soil samples at the VX dump site. British experts indicated that pre-1991 VX probably would have degraded to a safe compound by now, and there has been no post-war report that VX has been found.

BUSH LIE: The US also said that by conservative estimates, Iraq had a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical weapons agents and a CIA report from October, 2002 made a similar statement without specific evidence.

THE TRUTH: A DIA report from September, 2002 said that there "is no reliable information on whether Iraq is producing and stockpiling chemical weapons." No such weapons were used against US troops and none have been reported to have been found.

BUSH LIE: Powell also said to the UN that Iraq had chemical weapon shells and warheads, namely unused 122-mm shells designed to carry chemical agents. Powell said these might be the "tip of the iceberg".

THE TRUTH: No reports indicate that additional shells or warheads have been found. Those found through U.N. inspections were from the 1980's and were empty, still in crates and never used.

BUSH LIE: The Bush administration in addition made the case that the Iraqis dispersed rocket launchers and warheads holding biological weapons to the western desert, hiding them in palm groves and moving them every one to four weeks.

THE TRUTH: Nothing has been reported found, after months of searching by U.S. troops in the desert. Iraqi presidential science adviser Lt. Gen. Amer al-Saadi suggested the story of palm groves and weekly-to-monthly movement was lifted from an Iraqi general's written account of hiding missiles in the 1991 war.

BUSH LIE: The US said Iraq had stockpiled biological weapons like Anthrax and were getting ready to use them. Iraq declared that it produced 8,500 liters of anthrax before 1991 and U.N. inspectors estimated it could have made up to 25,000 liters. Powell said that none has been "verifiably accounted for".

THE TRUTH: No anthrax has been found. A confidential DIA report from September, 2002, said that the agency believed Iraq had biological weapons but had no information on types, quantities, or readiness for use. Three weeks before the war began, Iraq reported that soil samples confirmed its contention that a particular site had been used to dispose of anthrax stocks, and it supplied a list of witnesses to verify quantities. The war began before these witnesses could be interviewed.

BUSH LIE: The US also reported that defectors reportedly described mobile biological weapons factories using trucks and train cars. Powell displayed an artist's conception of one. After the war two semi-trailers were found which the Bush administration says were such labs.

THE TRUTH: The Iraqis say they were used to manufacture hydrogen for artillery weather balloons. Various U.S. and British intelligence teams disagree with identification of these as mobile labs. One of the most credible reports came from a Defense Intelligence Agency engineering team, which concluded that the trailers were in fact small-scale hydrogen factories. Records in England showed that British Marconi sold the same type of equipment in the trailers to Iraq in 1987 for production of hydrogen.

BUSH LIE: Powell showed a video of an Iraqi Mirage F-1 simulating delivery of anthrax by spraying from a belly tank. He said that four tanks were unaccounted for and that Iraq was building small unmanned aircraft (drones) for delivery of chemical and biological weapons.

THE TRUTH: U.N. inspectors reported that the Mirage video predated the 1991 war, the Mirage was destroyed in that war, and 3 of the 4 spray tanks were destroyed in the 1990's. No drones have been found with the capability to deliver chemical weapons. The known Iraqi drones are small, with an 8-meter wingspan.

BUSH LIE: Powell said "classified" documents found at a nuclear scientist's Baghdad home were dramatic confirmation of intelligence saying prohibited items were concealed this way.

THE TRUTH: U.N. nuclear inspectors later said the documents were old and irrelevant, some administrative material and some from a failed and well-known uranium enrichment program of the 1980s. Powell also said that, "We have no indication that Saddam Hussein has ever abandoned his nuclear weapons program." Mohammed El Baradei reported to the United Nations Security Council that the International Atomic Energy Agency had "to date found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapons program in Iraq." Since then no additional evidence has been reported to support a current or recent nuclear program. Former Iraqi nuclear scientist Imad Khadduri reported that Iraq's nuclear program was shut down in 1991.

BUSH LIE: Of course there is the now infamous attempt to acquire uranium from Africa. This item was not part of Powell's presentation to the U.N., its best known presentation was by George Bush in his 2003 State of the Union address. It is included here for convenience in producing a single reference for the most important points of the Bush administration's WMD assertions. "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

THE TRUTH: This claim was based on forged documents portraying an attempt by Iraq to buy uranium from Niger. The documents were easily identified as a forgery, the IAEI reached this conclusion only hours after it was granted access to the documents. Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson went to Niger at the request of Vice President Cheney's office and the CIA in February, 2002, a year earlier to investigate the validity of this source. He reported that U.S. ambassador Barbro Owens-Kirkpatrick felt that she had already refuted these claims in reports to Washington based on her factual knowledge.

BUSH LIE: The US also contended that aluminum tubes purchased by Iraq were for use in centrifuges for uranium enrichment, for nuclear weapons.

THE TRUTH: IAEA inspectors, Energy Department experts, and the State Department's intelligence bureau did not believe this was likely. Substantial modification would be needed to adapt the tubes to centrifuge use, but their specifications precisely match those used in for the Italian Medusa 81 artillery rocket. Identically matched characteristics include alloy, length, diameter, wall thickness, and anodized coating. IAEA inspectors observed a factory in Iraq which was using these tubes to manufacture artillery rockets.

BUSH LIE: Multiple intelligence sources indicted that Iraq was trying to buy magnets for use in uranium-enrichment centrifuges.

THE TRUTH: IAEA inspectors traced about a dozen types of imported magnets to their end users. Neither the inspectors nor post-war investigators have found magnets for use in centrifuges for uranium enrichment.

BUSH LIE: Intelligence sources say Iraq has a secret force of up to a few dozen prohibited Scud-type missiles, a program to build newer missiles with 600-mile range, and had put a roof over a rocket test stand to block view from spy satellites.

THE TRUTH: No Scud-type missiles have been found. In the 1990s U.N. inspectors accounted for all except two Scuds formerly possessed by Iraq. No program to build new, longer-range missiles has been found. The Iraqis reported that the roofed test stand had been converted from vertical firing to horizontal firing and was roofed for the obvious reason, things get very hot in the sun.

BUSH LIE: Iraq was violating a U.N. resolution by rejecting U-2 reconnaissance flights according to Powell's United Nations presentation.

THE TRUTH: Iraq did object to U-2 over flights at the time of Powell's presentation. However, it authorized U-2 over flights 5 days later, on February 10, 2003. U-2 reconnaissance flights began on February 17, about a month before the war started.

BUSH LIE: US says that Iraq was violating a U.N. resolution by rejecting private interviews with scientists by U.N. inspectors. Powell suggested that scientists withheld information on weapons of mass destruction due to fear of Saddam Hussein's regime. When interviews with scientists began news reports typically indicated that the scientists themselves had requested presence of Iraqi "minders". Fear of the regime probably was involved, but by early March 12 scientists had been interviewed privately.

THE TRUTH: Since Saddam Hussein was deposed all known reports indicate that scientists have continued to insist that no WMD programs had been active for a minimum of several years, with most shut down in 1991. One former Iraqi nuclear scientist who defected to Canada in 1998, Imad Khadduri, has always insisted that the nuclear program never recovered from the 1991 war, and was stopped at that time.

(Factual reporting and information for the above was obtained from Charles Hanley of the Associated Press and from many other sources.)

Saturday, March 24, 2007

World Poverty Under The Microscope

Never before in history have the poor financed the rich on such a massive scale and paid so dearly for their servitude as today.
- John Pilger

There is something profoundly wrong with a world in which the 400 highest income earners in the United States make as much money in a year as the entire population of 20 African nations with more than 300 million people . . . . and where the five richest men in the world have accumulated wealth equaling 168 billion dollars. According to the World Poverty Report, the gap between the affluent and the poor is growing larger every day and the despair that accompanies poverty is seen by many scholars as the primary cause of many of the world's most serious problems. Terrorism, disease, war, political unrest, hunger, malnutrition, polluted water, racial intolerance, crime, drug and alcohol abuse and suicide all can be traced to poverty. Nothing will test the moral foundation of humanity more than how mankind addresses this issue and nothing will be more important to our physical and spiritual survival.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Donkey Or Elephant

In thinking about the 2008 elections, think about the past and let there not be any confusion about the differences between Democrats and Republicans. It’s as plain as the largess of an Elephants ass. In the last Congress The Bush House of Representatives voted to approve $56 billion in tax cuts over five years, just one day after it passed other tax cuts totaling $39 billion over five years. That’s almost 100 billion in tax cuts in two days; ignoring the biggest deficit in US history. The biggest provision extended President Bush’s 2001 tax cut for stock dividends and capital gains for two years at a cost of $20 billion. All of the House’s maverick Republican conservatives, who had criticized their party leaders earlier for being too soft about spending cuts, voted enthusiastically for the tax cuts, which add up to nearly twice as much as the spending cuts passed last month. The budget plan, which also passed the House jcut about $51 billion over five years from programs like Medicaid, food stamps, farm subsidies and child-support enforcement programs aimed at deadbeat parents. The biggest expiring tax cut was one that would prevent the alternative minimum tax from applying to millions of additional families with incomes above $100,000 a year. Democrats accused the Republican majority of expanding tax cuts to the nation’s very richest families while cutting programs to help the poor. Representative Sander Levin, Democrat of Michigan said this,
The choice is clear, tax relief that goes to people making a million bucks or more, and cutting student loans, cutting food support for people who need it and cutting child support.
This is what a Republican President and Congress would mean again.